Blog

Welcome to our blog! Keep up with what we’re doing, latest events, and our thoughts on immigration reform. Subscribe to our RSS feed. :)

Domestic Violence Victims at Severe Risk under Current Immigration Policy
avatar

Earlier today, we summarized a news article, describing the groundbreaking research of ARC’s (Applied Research Center) “Shattered Families” Report. After reading the entire report, however, I am posting this link to the actual report and executive summary, because I feel it poignantly captures the damaging effects most of us never think about, when we discuss Secure Communities.

Having worked in the field of domestic violence and having seen firsthand the struggles and the effects of additional barriers to seeking help for domestic abuse, that are associated with being a Latina migrant worker, I also saw the effects these anti-immigrant laws (such as GA HB-87) were having on survivors of domestic violence.  Without these laws, Latina migrant women, like many other women across the United States, were already disinclined to report domestic abuses, due to fear of losing their children, hope that their situation would improve, and fear of being hurt or killed. However, it is well-known that there are many intersecting factors that hinder women from reporting violence or escaping their situations of abuse, including religious beliefs, cultural beliefs, poverty, and geographic locations. Some religions and cultures, for example, stress the sanctity of marriage to the point where it is taboo to divorce or separate, which introduces shame and isolation from support communities. Rural poverty also contributes to feelings of isolation in many communities, due to lack of transportation, physical distance from support centers, and economic dependency on their partners, among other factors.

To these barriers, I will add immigrant status. Being undocumented, or dealing with the stress of a partner or family member, who is undocumented, creates an increased sense of fear and helplessness. Abusers can easily use their partners’ fear of being deported to manipulate them into not leaving, not reporting abuse, not acquiring outside economic or social support, and doing exactly as they are told. Undocumented immigrant victims of abuse live in constant fear, which creates incredible emotional stress, depression, and sometimes even leads to suicide. Their children are also prone to depression and other psychosocial stress and are often also abused. For many women, their children’s abuse becomes the breaking point, but especially in areas without support centers that have translators, or without public safety officials, who do not engage in racial discrimination and/or cultural insensitivity, these women are utterly helpless, fearing that police intervention will bring deportation.

I would like to stress here that while these women may be undocumented, many had limited choice in coming to this country. In some cases, the women crossed the border to finally be with their husbands, who were working in the fields. In other instances, victims of domestic violence have been brought to this country entirely against their will by abusive partners. (In most Latin American countries, domestic violence is not considered a crime. And even when it is, corruption among law enforcement often prevents the law from protecting women against violence.) Other women had nothing left back home or where in fact escaping from abuse or an inability to feed their children, and came here for an opportunity to support their families or simply survive. Due to dire economic situations, some felt they had no other choice but to leave their children behind with family members, sending a check every month as remittance. In crossing the border, many become victims of gender-based violence, as they trek their way through costly, dangerous, often life-threatening conditions and surroundings under the terms of coyotes (human traffickers), who often physically, sexually, and emotionally abuse them. Knowing the risks ahead of them, these women decide to cross the border out of the most wretched desperation and a most profound love for their families.

When they cross the border, these women keep to themselves, scared of directing attention to themselves and their immigrant status. They rarely visit the doctor. (One woman I met had suffered through migraines and the pain of tooth decay for several months, before finally seeing a dentist. Despite needing a root canal, she postponed the surgery, because she could not yet afford it.). They don’t qualify for and don’t seek out public benefits. They don’t complain through sexual harassment and other work abuses. Like many other women living in poverty, they work service jobs and sometimes physically grueling labor for very little pay and no benefits. They will never reap the benefits of the social security, medicare, and other social programs they pay into. Others cannot work because their children are too young to go to school and they cannot afford childcare. This makes those in abusive partnerships and marriages even more dependent on their abusers. And so, they wait desperately till their children are old enough, or get part-time jobs or domestic positions that allow them to bring their children in to work. (In 2006, undocumented immigrants paid $7 billion in social security taxes, and in 2010, the  Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy  (ITEP) has estimated that undocumented immigrant households paid $11.2 billion in state and local taxes. http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/just-facts/unauthorized-immigrants-pay-taxes-too) In the eyes of these women, who have carried their crosses in silence, sacrificing everything they could in the name of love, duty, responsibility, and survival, you will not be able to mistake the strained, haunting gaze for that of a “lazy immigrant.” You will understand that within this gaze lies the traces of hopelessness and trauma so deep, young women can often appear twice their age. But if you look for just another moment, you will also see a waterfall of hope and determination in dreams that their children might have a better life.

To those who say that they should have gone to the back of the line and gotten across the border, like other “good” immigrants, I ask you this: Do you not think that if it were simply a matter of waiting their turn in a line, that these immigrants would much rather forget the fear of deportation, and the dangers, cost, and hardships of crossing the border “illegally,” in favor of applying through legal channels? There are large restrictions to applying for legal entry into the U.S., with the number of green cards available for low-skilled workers limited to a mere 5,000 a year. There are slots for political refugees, but only for citizens of a few countries with political unrest. There are no slots for economic refugees. Otherwise, immigrants have opportunities to come here through work or familial sponsorship, and even these methods are constricted to those with high levels of education or come with an indefinite timeline. For instance, an immigrant with a green card must wait at least five years before applying for a green card for her minor child. The timeline for the application process varies. For U.S. citizens, there is a 16-year wait period before a Mexican married son or daughter can apply for a green card. Further, U.S. citizens can only sponsor a very limited number of familial-based green cards over several years, and it is nearly impossible for their Mexican family members to even get permission to visit them in the U.S. (For more information, on the facts behind this fictitious line for legal entry, read this study by the Immigration Policy Center: http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/docs/WhyDontTheyGetInLine03-08.pdf)

Without a feasible means of legal entry, these women risk everything to come and survive, suffering through physical, emotional, and often sexual abuse at home and, for some, even at their workplaces. With the new hostile immigration policies (Secure Communities, AZ SB-1070, GA HB-87, AL HB 56, and soon SC SB-20) that are spreading through the country, these women face even more precarious situations, as they become even more afraid of law enforcement. U-Visa and VAWA (Violence Against Women Act) legislation were designed to help immigrant abuse victims out of their abusive situations by allowing them to apply for a visa, if they help put their abuser in jail or if they have been abused by a U.S. citizen or permanent resident. However, despite efforts at educating them on such laws, these women no longer trust the system (and perhaps rightfully so), as they see their neighbors’ families being torn apart around them, hear of increased deportations, and in states like Georgia and Alabama, suddenly find themselves out of work. They have been here, struggling in silence for years. Despite all the hardships, they have established their life here and are grateful for the opportunities they would not have otherwise had. America is their home, and the home of their children.

Now, we,  who work with domestic violence support groups, can no longer with complete confidence tell them that they will not lose their children, if they report abuse. We can no longer assure them that they and their children will be safe, because we know that policies like Secure Communities and state laws, that open the door for racial profiling and abuse of human rights, exist. According to the Applied Research Center, “immigrant victims of gender-based violence are at particular risk of losing their children to foster care.” ARC reports of numerous cases, in which “police arrested victims of domestic violence while investigating a report of abuse.” So instead of assurance, they are now “faced with an impossible choice: remain with an abuser or risk detention and loss of their children.” And when these women are caught, sent to detention centers, what we now know to be true is continued abuse, sexual, physical, and emotional, from guards at immigrant detention centers (See this article http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2011/02/15/us-protect-detainees-immigration-facilities-rape and the Frontline Documentary, “Lost in Detention”).  Is this the same America that inspired the sonnet engraved on a bronze plaque inside the Statue of Liberty? Have we really merited the lines “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…” What I am hearing now-a-days is:

“Send back these tired, these poor,

These huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send back the homeless, tempest-tost, regardless of their pleas.

 I lift my lamp beside security cameras, electric fences~ to show my borders

reinforced.”

In the current anti-immigrant climate, these women not only continue to be victims of violence from individual abusers, but also from an entire system of economic and social oppression, that are the effects of Mexican and U.S. policies. Where would you even begin to heal from these layers upon layers of abuse? How would you even begin to accept that for all the sacrifices made, the sweat, the tears, the despair, the disappointed hopes upon disappointed hopes, for all the struggle to simply live in freedom, in peace, you will never escape the chains of abuse, of poverty, of inequality, of rejection? And how could you, knowing these real stories, these real effects of insensitive legislation, sit there and watch the tears streaming down of a woman, who after years of struggle and abuse, finally discovered a loving relationship with her husband, only to wind up alone, with her children, who are not yet school-age, while her husband is deported? What would you say to that? And how could you sit there and do nothing?

*For those who view this issue as the product of a flawed system, please go to our action page (Under the Overview tab) and write to your congressmen and local officials. If no pressure is applied, nothing will get done. Thank you!

~Zulema Ibarra, IRN Director of Outreach

Posted in Blog, News | Tagged abuse victims, anti-immigrant legislation, culture, domestic violence, immigrant abuse, immigration, racial profiling, secure communities, U-Visa, undocumented immigrants, undocumented immigration, undocumented women, VAWA, violence victims | Comments Off

Thank you, but we need IRN
avatar

Thank you, but we need Immigration Reform Now.

Let me praise the bold and clever move by the Obama Administration on the announcement to prioritize deportation cases by combining the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice to review detainee cases under current deportation orders.  The Associated Press reports that deportees who have no criminal record will be allowed to stay in the country and apply for a work permit.

For the approximate 300,000 individuals that this policy will immediately affect, we are  pleased.  However, it would have helped to resolve problems in states like Georgia, if the non-deportees who are languishing in the shadows could also apply for a work permit. While this is a celebrated move, we must remember that this policy is temporary.  President Obama or his replacement can just as easily reverse this policy. 

I am certain that this long-hoped-for change came about because of the constant pressure on the Administration by immigration reform sympathizers and affected constituents caught up in our broken immigration system.  This change helps.  It makes us “feel” better, but it does not solve the problems created by recently passed laws in various southern states, including my beautiful Georgia.

We must increase our pressure on the President and Congress members to use the blue print put forward by President Obama and pass legislation for comprehensive immigration reform.   We must continue to counter the infuriating Republican rhetoric and falsehoods. This policy does not grant back-door amnesty  as proclaimed by at least one legislator.  It most certainly does not allow anyone to unfairly compete with Americans who are looking for jobs as claimed by another.

It is true that many Republicans once promoted an immigration overhaul including the passing of the Dream Act.  However, political posturing along with threats by radicals to oust the incumbents via primary challenges have turned Republicans into obstructionists.  They have abandoned their sense of positive legislation in favor of party-line politics. Again, we must stay our course and continue the pressure.

It is wonderful that this new policy will allow some parents to return home from detention centers and continue supporting their children.  It will allow some families to remain intact and ease some of the anguish of those in the deportation system.  It does not ease the anguish of all those associated with this issue in the states where extreme laws have been passed that make criminals out of anyone associated with an undocumented person.  Georgia’s new HB 87 law would make the wife of American Hero, Antonio Diaz Chacon, a criminal.  We must pass Immigration Reform Now. 

In solidarity,Paul Bridges

Posted in Blog | 1 Comment

The Conservative Republican and Immigration Reform
avatar

Immigration Reform laws passed by the various states CANNOT be considered an action appropriate for Conservative Republicans.  The results of those laws are mean-spirited, detrimental to local economies and anti-family.

Some reporters refer to me as a “self-described Conservative Republican (CR)” an apparent insinuation that perhaps my stand is not conservative.  Well:

Conservative Republicans believe in small government – not the replication of federal laws into state laws creating duplication, making criminals-by-association of otherwise law-abiding citizens.  These laws cause a growth of governmental agencies to enforce, house and prosecute those (children, spouses, grandparents and friends), who are turned into criminals by this new law, for transporting or harboring a relative.

Conservative Republicans believe that we should assist and support businesses – especially small business.  Government should not force the removal of workers who’ve been doing a job for years, causing a breakdown of that (agricultural) business.  A CR would seek to find a solution to problems – not create hurdles and obstacles against the production of the products of a business that drives the state’s economic machine.  A CR would find a way for the small businesses to keep those highly productive workers who want to work and support their families.

Conservative Republicans believe in family values.  These new laws rip families apart and do not support those values that CR hold dear.

As a CR, I am an American. Conservative Republicans believe in the right of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness – no caveats.

As a CR, I am Christian.  Conservative Republicans believe the Word of The Lord.  “What you do unto the least of my brethren, you do unto me.” – Jesus.

Conservative Republicans believe in the rule of law.  If one breaks a law then a prescribed punishment follows and is administered in the light of rehabilitation.  A CR understands the difference between Criminal law and Civil law.

Most people, who look at the new laws passed by those states, know that the laws are not acts of conservatism.   If one looks at the Ronald Reagan’s or George W. Bush Administrations’ stances on immigration, then clearly these new laws also are not Republican acts. – Paul Bridges

Posted in Blog | Tagged business, conservative Republican, government, immigration, immigration reform, Paul Bridges, politics, undocumented immigration | Leave a comment

Alabama Follows in the Anti-Imigrant Footsteps of Other States
avatar

OUR MISSION has been reinforced with this news of
ALABAMA’s new law.  
READ what the SPLC says:
July 8, 2011  Dear Friend, 
Today we filed a lawsuit against Alabama’s new, draconian anti-immigrant law. The New York Times
calls it “the most extreme” in the nation. It makes Arizona’s anti-immigrant
legislation look like child’s play.
(http://newsletter.splcenter.org/cgi-bin4/DM/t/nBh440R3nCB0FgJ0Gdya0Ev)
The Alabama law makes it a crime for anyone-citizen and non-citizen alike-to
drive someone who is undocumented to church or a hospital. It requires
school children to report on the immigration status
of their parents. 
It even prevents refugees who have been granted asylum in our country from going to
a state university. And, without question, it will lead to massive racial
profiling and discourage victims of crime from cooperating with the police.
At the press conference we held today, one of our clients-a minister-said
that the law “violates core values of various faiths because it criminalizes
acts of love and hospitality.”
The law reminds me of the Jim Crow era. It will create an underclass of
people who are denied equal protection under the law, just like the racist
laws that stained Alabama and the South for many decades.
Like the racists laws we’ve fought in the past, we cannot let this one
stand.
Thank you for your support and dedication to justice. I’ll keep you updated
as this important legal battle progresses.

~Paul Bridges, President of Immigration Reform Now

Posted in Blog | Tagged Alabama, Alabama HB-56, anti-immigrant legislation, anti-immigration, general immigration, SPLC | Comments Off

Report on the July 26, 2011 Senate Subcommittee Hearing
avatar

On July 26, 2011, Paul Bridges had the opportunity of being one of the panelists in the Senate Subcommittee Hearing on “The Economic Imperative for Enacting Immigration Reform.” The following is a commentary from Attny. Rebecca Black.

Comment on July 26 testimony to the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, Refugees and
Border Security Committee on the Judiciary

The Senate Subcommittee invited a select group of people to testify on various aspects of
immigration reform July 26, 2011. The Senate preselected these individuals for the various
points they would present before the committee. This group included mayors from the small
towns of Lewiston Maine, Utica New York, and Uvalda Georgia; two highly respected technical
universities of Cornell and the Rochester Institute of Techology (RIT); Microsoft and Nasdaq to
represent the high tech industries that drive our economy in so many ways, Dr. Arora
representing Asian Tech workers through Immigration Voice, and finally Senator Patrick Leahy
(D-Vt.).

As these people were pre-selected for the testimony that they would present and put in the now
voluminous record pertaining to immigration reform, it seems clear where the Senate’s interests
primarily lies- STEM competitiveness. The testimony of Microsoft, Nasdaq and Cornell focused
on the critical need to support immigration reform so that our technology based STEM industries
would remain strong and competitive. Dr. Arora spoke to the need to support additional visa
numbers so that these workers are able to adjust status to become permanent residents. RIT was
the only interest group to point out negatives, being concerned about abuses and fraud in the
H1B and L1 programs. It must be noted that companies filing these applications pay heft fraud
and retraining fees so it is USCIS’s own fault in not managing their well-funded programs better.

The Mayor of Lewiston, Maine provided testimony on the valuable economic role the large
refugee population has brought to his small town. This vibrant community of refugee Somalians
has filled vacant storefronts and added a new commercial tax base, in addition to filling what
would be deserted housing and shopping at other local commercial establishments. The Mayor
of Utica New York testified to the economic achievements and contributions of the immigrant
Eastern Europeans in his community and the need for positive immigration reform to enable the
undocumented workers to have a pathway to become legal. And finally the Mayor of Uvalda
GA, Paul Bridges testified on the huge economic impact that the undocumented workers have
on agriculture, their work ethic and the disastrous effects that Georgia’s new anti-alien laws are
having in the farming communities in South Georgia and across the country. Finally, Senator
Leahy testified generally, supporting STEM immigration reform as well as citing the Cato
Institute’s studies showing the overwhelmingly huge positive impact that the 10 million or so
undocumented aliens have on our economy and the need for a comprehensive immigration
reform.

Given that four of the speakers testified positively on STEM reform whereas the three mayors
spoke of the impact of the various immigrant communities in their communities, it seems clear
that the Senate’s primary concern lies with making sure the STEM industries interest are being
protected and that it has little concern to make significant changes to work out a solution to the
problem of the undocumented worker. Our country needs to address the realities of 10-11 million
people living in the shadows and also to have a coherent plan for the future. If this is what you
support, then we need you to be vocal in sending your senators and congressmen emails, faxes
and telephone calls asking them to support positive immigration reform for the undocumented
people underpinning much of our economies. I have included below the links to the various
testimonies presented that day.

Rebecca Black

Attorney with the Immigration Law Offices of David R. Fletcher, PA

Senator Leahy

Mayor Bidges, Uvalda GA

Mayor Gilbert, Lewiston ME

Mayor Roefaro, Utica NY

Brad Smith, Microsoft

Bob Greifeld, Nasdaq

David Skorton, President Cornell

Dr. Hira, Associate Professor RIT

Dr. Arora, Immigration Voice

Posted in Blog, Event Reports | Tagged Congress, economics, immigration, immigration legislation, immigration reform, Senate subcommittee hearing, undocumented immigration | Leave a comment
WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera

Switch to our mobile site